01/04/2024 Oncology Daily Report

Study Phase Distribution

A total of 16 clinical trials were located, spanning various phases of development. Specifically, there were 3 trials in Phase 1, and 2 trials in Phase 1b. Phase 1/2, which combines early safety and efficacy assessments, comprised 3 trials. The more advanced Phase 2, focusing on efficacy and side effects, included 4 trials. A single trial was found in Phase 2a. Finally, Phase 3, which is typically more extensive and aims to confirm effectiveness, involved 3 trials. This distribution highlights the progression and diversity of clinical research stages.

Cancer Type Distribution

Among the 16 trials, breast cancer emerged as a primary focus, with four distinct studies delving into its various forms. These studies ranged from examining early-stage breast cancer to exploring the challenges of metastatic breast cancer, including cases that are HER2-negative but with HER2-positive circulating tumor cells, HR+/HER2-negative metastatic, and the particularly challenging ERBB2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases.

The realm of lymphoma and hematologic malignancies, often overshadowed by more common cancers, received significant attention with three dedicated studies. These studies include an investigation into the primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a rare and aggressive form, and treatment strategies for stages II-IV follicular lymphoma. Additionally, a study focused on hematologic malignancies for graft-versus-host disease prevention, highlighting the intricate interplay between cancer treatment and immune response.

Multiple myeloma, a cancer of the plasma cells, was the subject of two studies. These investigations aimed to enhance understanding and treatment approaches for patients newly diagnosed with this cancer, as well as those facing relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

A study on lower lung or upper abdominal malignancies addressed cancers often diagnosed in advanced stages, emphasizing the need for research in areas where early detection is challenging.

Colorectal cancer, a common yet complex disease, was explored in two studies. One focused on metastatic colorectal cancer with a specific KRAS(G12C) mutation, while the other delved into metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, underscoring the importance of genetic factors in cancer treatment and prognosis.

Gastric cancer, specifically gastric adenomas or early gastric cancers, was the subject of one study, pointing to a growing interest in gastrointestinal cancers and their early-stage treatment options.

Pediatric oncology, a field where every advance can significantly impact young lives, saw a study dedicated to pediatric relapsed/refractory CD22+ BCP-ALL, a form of leukemia. This study underscored the continual search for better treatment options for our youngest and most vulnerable patients.

Prostate cancer, often diagnosed in its advanced stages, was the focus of a study examining newly diagnosed cases with suspected lymph node metastasis, highlighting the importance of early detection and intervention.

Lastly, a study on postoperative endometrial and cervical cancer reflected the ongoing efforts to improve outcomes for gynecologic cancer patients, an area that necessitates continued research and advancement.

In summary, these 16 studies provide a panoramic view of the current landscape of cancer research, each contributing vital insights into the multifaceted world of oncology. From breast cancer to gynecologic malignancies, the breadth of these studies mirrors the diverse challenges faced in cancer treatment and underscores the relentless pursuit of better outcomes for patients worldwide.

Intervention Distribution

A total of 5 studies investigated Chemotherapy (RDI during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Busulfan/Melphalan/Carfilzomib regimen, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin with chemotherapy, Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin, Radiotherapy with Pyrotinib and Capecitabine), 2 studies investigated Targeted Therapy (Lapatinib, Sotorasib with panitumumab), 2 studies focused on Surgical Interventions (MC-003 solution, PSMA-targeted radioguided surgery), 2 studies utilized Radiotherapy Technology (Optical surface imaging and CBCT, iCBCT-guided oART), 1 study applied Prophylactic Therapy (Intravenous and intrathecal CNS prophylaxis), 1 study combined Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (Bendamustine-Rituximab vs. Lenalidomide-Rituximab), 1 study combined Chemotherapy and Hormone Therapy (Chemotherapy plus ET vs. CDK4/6-inhibitors plus ET), and 1 study used Immunotherapy (CD24 fusion protein with tacrolimus and methotrexate).

Clinical Impact Potential

Among the identified studies, 1 study was categorized as having High Impact Potential, indicating a significant potential to influence the field or practice. The majority, with 14 studies, were classified under Medium Impact Potential, suggesting a moderate level of influence and importance. Lastly, 1 study was identified as having Low Impact Potential, implying a lesser degree of anticipated influence or novelty in its findings. This distribution reflects the varying degrees of impact and importance that different studies can hold within their respective domains.

Read more about the studies